]> 2026-09-30T04:06:20+02:00 Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca 0 en 143900 -15.7961915,-69.3831079 Management, protection and control of Lake Titicaca basin's water resources. Water Quality Governance 2448790 Sovereign state/national/federal government Non-legislative governmental agency Development/humanitarian interest Environmental interest Agriculture or Irrigation Domestic/Urban Supply Other Ecological Services 2013-03-04T02:25:12Z 2456355.6008333 Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca 0 1 template 3 [[ASI:+]] [[Case Study::Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca]] Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca# QUERYd8987004a9f7f79a192edf7b36bf97da 0 [8,"smw-constraint-error-allows-value-list","Moist tropical (K\u00f6ppen A-type); Semi-arid\/steppe (K\u00f6ppen B-type); Arid\/desert (K\u00f6ppen B-type); Dry-winter","Moist tropical (K\u00f6ppen A-type), Semi-arid\/steppe (K\u00f6ppen B-type), Arid\/desert (K\u00f6ppen B-type), Humid mid-latitude (K\u00f6ppen C-type), Continental (K\u00f6ppen D-type), Moist, Monsoon, Dry-summer, Dry-winter, cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar), ...","Climate"] Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca# ERR96ebd2bde492267ceaf5b922f2b54598 0 [8,"smw-constraint-error-allows-value-list","agricultural- cropland and pasture, rangeland, religious\/cultural sites","agricultural- cropland and pasture, agricultural- confined livestock operations, conservation lands, industrial use, mining operations, forest land, rangeland, urban, urban- high density, religious\/cultural sites","Land Use"] Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca# ERR76ccac00b166651c0532c92a2995719b 0 * Without stakeholder participation in the management of water resources, efficiency and effectiveness are limited. With little or no stakeholder participation in the management of the [[Lake Titicaca]] basin, [[ALT]] has only been minimally effective at producing results. It is clear that a more comprehensive system of inclusion of the public is needed to take place in order for the Authority to complete its goals. If three out of the four problems identified by the institution deal with the people's actions on the water and land in the basin, then they must be included for optimal functioning of the initiative. Otherwise, gaps and resentment are created by an organization acting above those who most use the lake. Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca# 5682e034cef37a6c7aaa38f62474484c 0 * By viewing the basin as a joint body of water shared equally between countries, much conflict is avoided. By signing an agreement in 1957, Peru and Bolivia bound themselves into considering [[Lake Titicaca]] as a shared body of water, owned by neither country, but both. As a result, there are few, if any, "upstream versus downstream" issues (even though the Desaguadero River does flow into Bolivia from the lake). The countries have worked very well in a cooperative way to manage the lake, both doing their parts. This can largely be attributed to the lake being "owned" by both nations. Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca# b28a759fef5382fb2694992a9632da02 Case Study 102 en Case Study